Blog

  • Safety Net of Sky: 30th March – 27th May

    Safety Net of Sky: 30th March – 27th May

     

    The Koestler Trust is currently running an exhibition curated by young people from the Liverpool Youth Offending Service, with help from professional curators.

    The exhibition includes paintings, drawings and sculpture as well as creative writing which were selected from entried to the 2011 Koestler Awards.

    The exhibition is taking place at the World Museum on William Brown Street in Liverpool.

    For more information you can visit: The Koestler Trust or the World Museum

  • What is Outsider?

    What is Outsider?

    Pascal Maissoneuve

    I have recently been conducting some further research into the way we display and interpret exhibitions of Outsider Art or work by Marginalised Artists. This research has raised a few questions for me that I thought might be interesting to include in the blog.

    I have been reading Lyle Rexer’s ‘How to Look at Outsider Art’, in which the author himself questions what really counts as Outsider Art. The term itself is so broad and covers so many different bases that more often than not we struggle to aptly define it at all. Rexer provides numerous definitions throughout the introduction and first chapter of the book; a chapter entitled ‘Art without Artists’. He quite correctly claims that Outsider Art “unlike the isms… does not refer to the art but to the status of the people who make it.”[1] He adds that the term has “become a catchall phrase for everything that is ostensibly raw, untutored and irrational in art.”[2]

    The traditional ‘movement’ of Outsider Art (if we can even call it a movement at all; apparently lacking precursors and emerging mainly as a ‘hindsight’ movement) includes artists from a whole host of different backgrounds. We have the ‘legendary’ Outsiders who include Henry Darger, Richard Dadd and Adolf Wolfli, alongside less well known artists who have been labelled within this category. But, Rexer argues – as I do to some extent – what really defines all of these artists? What is it about them or their work that enables us to group them all within this category of Outsider Art?

    Certainly, within the traditional art historical canon, movements such as Impressionism, Expressionism, and Surrealism to name a few, are defined by the work not the artist. They are defined by a distinct style, a certain brushstroke, or bold colours. Outsider Art is much more difficult to define in this way. It is based on the artist – their psychological state, their political standing or their social exclusion. As Rexer notes: “in art galleries and in most exhibitions of self-taught and outsider art, one is likely to see everything from early America advertising signs and Native American artifacts to Haitian Voudou flags, religious art from the South, and works by people in severe mental distress.”[3]

    Is it right, then, to group artists such as the academically trained Dadd together with the very private Darger? Darger, as one example, certainly did not actively want anyone to see his work, or even discuss it. Is Dadd only grouped within this category of Outsider Art because of his battle with Schizophrenia which resulted in him murdering his own father? After all, before the onset of his Schizophrenia, he was a professionally trained artist, who travelled the world to advance his skills. We could argue that artists such as Paul Cezanne, Gustave Courbet and Eduard Manet were Outsider Artists of their time. They did not fit into any previously existing art historical movement, and their work challenged pre-existing ideas of colour, subject matter and style. Rexer explains that the group of artists who exhibited at the Salon des Refuses of 1863 after announcing a break with tradition could be described as Outsiders – they were consciously working outside of the art historical norm.

    Giuseppe Archimboldo’s work of still lifes using fruit and vegetables are world-renowned, but similar work by Pascal Maisonneuve using shells to create faces is labelled as Outsider Art. How do we explain this divide, this difference? It has crossed my mind that perhaps the work of celebrated Outsider Artists such as Darger and Wolfli might come to be accepted into an art historical movement within time. Perhaps Maisonneuve’s work might sit alongside Archimboldo’s in an exhibition celebrating still lifes – just as the work of the Impressionists now sits in the timeline of the progression of nineteenth century French painting, following the work of David and Ingres. Outsider Art seems to me to be a label that encompasses the work of artists whom we do not know how – or where – to put. It is a ‘movement’ (in the loosest sense of the term) that covers a huge expanse of time and a huge range of styles, subject matter and indeed history. To finish, I would like to use a thought-provoking quote by Rexer which highlights the complicated nature of using such a broad term: “many of these objects do share some common ground, but putting them into a very large suitcase called ‘self-taught’ or ‘outsider’ certainly makes them harder to appreciate.”[4]

    References:

    [1] Rexer, Lyle. How to Look at Outsider Art  (Harry N. Abrams Inc, 2005), p 12

    [2] Ibid, p 6

    [3] Ibid, p 10

    [4] Ibid, p 10

  • What’s On in the Outsider Art World – May 2012

    What’s On in the Outsider Art World – May 2012

     

    Image

    Galerie Gugging, Austria

    Until 28th Oct 2012
    ‘August Walla Retrospective’

    Until 7th Oct 2012
    ‘Sexi-Blatt’
    An exhibition based on the theme of sexuality

    Mad Musee, Belgium

    Until 6th May 2012
    ‘Rumours’
    An exhibition that includes the work of Morton Bartlett, Lee Godie, Loulou and Miroslav Tichy

    The Arts Festival of North Norway, Norway

    24th June 2012
    ‘The World of Outsider Art’ at the Trondenes Historic Centre, Harstad Norway

    The Aprad Szenes-Vieira da Silva, Lisbon Portugal

    Until 23rd Sep 2012
    ‘Arte Bruta – Terra Incognita’
    Outsider Art from the collections of Richard Troger and Antonio Saint-Silvestre

    Portugese Association of Outsider Art, Lisbon Portugal

    Until 31st May 2012
    ‘Xico Nico, Sculptor’

    Intuit: The Center for Intuitive and  Outsider Art, Chicago

    Until 30th June 2012
    ‘Heaven and Hell’

    Bethlem Heritage, London

    13th June 2012 – 13th July 2012
    ‘Hollow Space and Outgrowth’
    “Artists from Bethlem Gallery respond to the historical and art collection in the Archives and Museum”

    Art et Marges Musee, Belgium

    10th Feb – 20th May 2012
    ‘La Fabuloserie: le fabuleux destin des Bourbonnais’

    Frist Center for Visual Arts, Tennessee

    24th Feb – 29th May 2012
    ‘Fairy Tales, Monsters and the Genetic Imagination’

  • Edward Burra (1905 – 1976) – Modern Connections

    Edward Burra (1905 – 1976) – Modern Connections

    Edward Burra, The Snack Bar (1930)

    Edward Burra, not exactly an ‘Outsider Artist’, never seemed to quite fit in to any particular art canon. After visiting the first solo exhibition of his work in 25 years at Pallant House Gallery in Chichester earlier this year, I could see connections with German Expressionism, Surrealism, and potentially Impressionism – connections which I will discuss in more detail later in this post. However, despite being named one of the most acclaimed modern British artists, his work is somewhat unknown to the majority.

    Working predominantly in watercolour, Burra’s work is unlike any other pieces found in this medium. He uses the paint to produce a bold, solid colour – a characteristic that made his work centre stage at Tate Britain’s recent ‘Watercolour’ exhibition. Burra’s work encompasses four main themes; the first being the almost voyeuristic depictions of prostitutes and drinkers, then there are his more macabre, surrealist works, then his landscapes and, finally, his theatre designs.

    His depictions of the Hollywood scene and life in Harlem – in which he represents drinkers, prostitutes and immigrants – are almost comparable to the work of early Impressionists working in Paris in the late nineteenth century. The voyeuristic, almost flaneur-like gaze of the artist represents the woes and tribulations of modern industrial life. Similarly to Eduard Manet and Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Burra plays the flaneur in these works, for example in his piece entitled The Snack Bar (1930), which depicts a prostitute in a café-bar. Comparable to Manet’s scenes of café-life, such as At a Corner Café-Concert (1878), Burra’s work unashamedly depicts working-class urban life. The idea of the flaneur, a theory highlighted in the work of Charles Baudelaire, is that the artist depicts fleeting moments in time; capturing everyday life on the canvas – or in Burra’s case, on paper.

    Burra’s work has already been compared by many to the work of the German Expressionists Otto Dix, George Grosz and Max Beckmann. The German Expressionists used their art to portray their discontent with the rapid modernisation and industrialisation that was taking place in Germany during the early twentieth-century. Similarly to Burra, they worked in bold, solid colour, with harsh lines and also depicted the turmoil and dissatisfaction that is often a companion to the loneliness of modern city life. Dix, Grosz and Beckmann, amongst other Expressionists, were not afraid to show the dark side of urban life; the back streets, the macabre and the poverty; subject matter that resulted in the their inclusion in the 1937 Degenerate Art exhibition in Munich.

    Despite the difficulty to place Burra within the traditional art historical canon, his work is definitely something to be celebrated. His use of watercolours can only be admired; from a distance, it is impossible to tell that his courageous use of colour is produced using this medium. His work shamelessly depicts the underworld of modern urban life; a theme that is iconic and almost representative of works produced during the early twentieth-century in Western cities.

    The Edward Burra Exhibition, which began at Pallant House Gallery, Chichester earlier this year is now touring. You can see this exhibition at the Djanogly Art Gallery until the 27th of May 2012.

  • Review and Summary: A. L. Kennedy’s Art and Madness, BBC Radio 3

    On Sunday 22nd April, BBC Radio 3 aired a programme by writer A. L. Kennedy on the supposed links between art and madness. In this post, I want to briefly summarise Kennedy’s views within the programme and discuss some of the questions she raises.

    “Losing one’s mind is a negative, terrifying experience, freeing it can be nerve-wracking too, but also exhilarating, beautiful and eloquent – for everyone.”

    Kennedy begins by noting that we often link art and madness – we don’t link, for example, art and sport, or art and banking. As a female writer, she claims that ‘mad dead Sylvia Plath’ and ‘mad dead Virginia Woolf’ are her role models. As humans, we are ‘obsessed’ by ‘mad, dead’ icons – and, to some extent, this is a myth that can trivialise madness and marginalise art.

    But, what constitutes madness? Dorothy Rowe, Psychologist and writer, claims that even those with a ‘healthy mind’ cannot directly see reality. It is something which is impossible for us as human beings. We can only believe the ideas our brain gives us. Reality is in fact, she claims, a story we tell ourselves; how then, do we know what is, really is?

    Further into the programme, Kennedy takes us as the listener on a journey to a hotel. She is suffering from dizziness, nausea and anxiety – something, she claims, that might suggest to the hotel receptionist that she is ‘stoned’. She explains that that wants to tell the receptionist that she is a professional – a writer, but suddenly, she is embarrassed and ashamed of her profession. To claim she is a writer, in this country in particular, will only confirm beliefs of extremity, eccentricity and madness. She asks, rather pivotally, has a long term exposure to her art harmed her?

    Lisa Appignanesi, a British writer, states that there are many people self-diagnosed and professionally diagnosed with a mental illness who do not ‘create’ in some sense – therefore, there cannot be a direct link between art and ‘madness’. Why is it then, that we insist that all artists experience ‘bad times’?

    Shakespeare’s portrayals of madness are interesting to note. For example, Hamlet is the “sanest guy” acting out in an insane situation and Lady MacBeth is maddened by destruction not construction – or creation. Shakespeare, then, could be said to focus on the insanity of the world, rather than the insanity of the artist.

    The individual, it is claimed, is most defined as individual in extreme states. Madness, then, is an extreme expression of individuality.

    The modern era of art embraced madness; something which could be portrayed as somewhat insulting to those who wake up every morning with no choice. Involuntary mental distress means that our guesses are wrong; we become anxious as a result of this, and then fearful – “we feel ourselves falling apart.” Often, literature on the connection between art and madness beautifies the experience of mentall illness. Psychiatrist R. D Laing once said that Schizophrenia was a type of poetry.

    Kennedy looks at the work of William Kurelek. She asks if we choose to associated madness with artso that we don’t have to associate it with ourselves.

    The connection that is usually made is one which states that the ‘mad’ artist creates more, or perhaps only creates at times when they are experiencing mental distress. This however, is evidentally not the case. Van Gogh, for example, could not paint during times of deep distress and Virginia Woolf would often only experience breakdowns after she had written.

    Being an artist can often create another identity for someone who is suffering from a mental illness. They become an ‘artist’ as opposed to an ‘unwell person’. The creation of art can be therapeutic – not, as Kennedy claims, in the sense of Art Therapy, but in terms of the fact that producing art for many people makes them feel better. Does this not then undermine the myth if art is in fact a cure for madness?

    Being an artist in itself can create turmoil and breakdowns. Performance artist Bobby Baker has claimed that the struggle of working so many hours for an unstable income led to her breakdown. Artists are often idolised, but not paid well for this idolisation. Baker would paint watercolours of her standing on the edge of a cliff during her darkest moments. Her daughter later revealed that she found these images comforting; to her it meant her mother was using an outlet for her feelings that didn’t involve actually going and standing on the edge of a cliff. We all have ideas and thoughts that are unacceptable, and artists ‘speak’ these thoughts. Baker describes the ‘nutty’ artist, who represents what we are scared to see in ourselves.

    Being an artist is not just an occupation, often, it is what makes a person who they are. This can become all consuming. But we, as art viewers, can learn to live and understand ourselves through the work of artists. Art has the ability to help us deal with our lives; it goes on transforming, and it goes on being ‘new’. The ability to create, Kennedy claims, is not something restricted to the ‘mad’, it is in fact something for everyone. Through art we can change the story – we can see the light instead of the dark. It can help us be here, and be alive.

    The BBC programme can be found at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01ghb93

  • Design and Display: The Halle Saint Pierre, Paris

    Design and Display: The Halle Saint Pierre, Paris

    Completely conversely to the bright walls of the typical contemporary art gallery exhibition, the temporary exhibition at the Halle Saint Pierre in Paris was shrouded in darkness. This exhibition is called ‘Banditi dell’arte’ (which Google Translate tells me means ‘Bandits of the Art’) and is the first exhibition in France of Italian Outsider Art.

    At the bottom of the hill that leads up to the Sacre Coeur and Montmartre; one of my favourite Parisian places, sits the Halle Saint Pierre, an institution which celebrates the work of Outsider Artists. One of my interests regarding Outsider Art is how, often, the work of marginalised artists is displayed so differently to the work of ‘non-marginalised’ contemporary artists. This is what I was thinking about during my visit to Banditi dell’arte, and therefore, what this blog post will be focusing on.

    On entering, the exhibition space was very, very dark. Black walls. Spot lit works. It was incredibly different to what you might expect when visiting a ‘white cube’ contemporary exhibition. Many of the works, I found, were by ‘anonymous’ artists – and many of the works in fact were also nameless – something, perhaps, one would not come across in the commercial, contemporary art world. The works were grouped by artist, with a brief biography (only in French) and each artist almost had their own ‘mini-exhibition’; four or five works on display and their own corner or section of the room.

    There seemed to me to be no chronological order or narrative to the overall exhibition – perhaps just the fact that they were Italian Outsider Artists. There was also no set format for the display of the works, it was almost as if someone different had curated each artist’s ‘mini-exhibition’. Also, I found there were a considerable amount of photographs representing installations (rather than actually having the installations on display within the exhibition).

    Upstairs, in their more permanent exhibition room, I found the obligatory white walls. Similarly to the temporary exhibition space, this area also designated a space to each artist; they had their own sections again displaying about four or five works each.

    In terms of the technology used within the exhibition, any notebooks or doodle-books that had once belonged to the artists were displayed on screens that provided a slideshow of the pages. I found this quite a nice touch, as the actual book was under a glass case, but you were still able to explore the work inside of it.

    Something I noticed, in both exhibition spaces in fact, was that because of the partitions and dividers that separated each artist’s ‘mini-exhibition’, you were never just looking at one piece in isolation. Whilst looking at one artist’s work, you could be peering through the gaps at another’s at the same time.

    I would like to do some more research into the differences that are perhaps apparent between the exhibiting of marginalised artists work and that of ‘non-marginalised’ contemporary works. For now, I hope you enjoy this post. Sorry it is quite brief, I just wanted to get down everything I had written on a scrap of paper during my visit before I lost it!

    Image

    Banditi dell’arte: 23rd March 2012 – 6th January 2013, Halle Saint Pierre, Paris

    Don’t forget to follow me on Twitter: @kd_outsiderart

  • *GUEST POST* The Berlin Wall East Side Gallery by Lizzie Davey

    *GUEST POST* The Berlin Wall East Side Gallery by Lizzie Davey

    Many thanks to Lizzie Davey for this post on the Berlin Wall East Side Gallery. Read Lizzie’s blog for more posts about travel and culture: Wanderful World.

    Image

    At 1.3 kilometres long and featuring 106 paintings by international artists, the East Side Gallery is the largest open air gallery in the world. It stands as a memorial for freedom at a time when the future of Germany was unstable. The use of art here has become an expression of the turbulent times a separated and then unified Germany faced; the old and the new Berlin. In 1989, when the wall came down, hundreds of international artists collected at the east side which was once untouchable, and turned it into a colourful, exquisite memorial, providing a new future and place for the wall in Berlin. The paintings exhibited here express a new beginning and put forward new, euphoric hopes for the city; hopes that were formed when the wall came down.

    When visiting the East Side Gallery last year, I was amazed by the diversity of imagery on display. However, all seemed to convey a similar theme; freedom. The array of colour displayed in such a large format can be overwhelming, but once I reached the end I wanted more. Remembering that the gallery is actually exhibited on the wall, the wall that was once a huge part of German history is amazing and will enforce the struggle Germany faced during this time for years to come.

    Some critics state that the wall is in such bad condition now that the original artworks are almost undecipherable. I, however, think that it has evolved with the times, creating a portal where citizens of Berlin can express their feelings via an artistic platform. In some ways, the graffiti overlaying the original paintings only enhances the wall, showing how the visions and outlooks of the people have changed over time. Each piece was unique and brilliant in its own way, including the newly added graffiti that has accumulated. The memorial was created to express freedom, and surely this is evident in the way the wall appears today as an almost interactive gallery.    

    Again, thanks to Lizzie for this post. Don’t forget to check out her blog: Wanderful World.

  • What’s On in the Outsider Art World.. March/April 2012

    What’s On in the Outsider Art World.. March/April 2012

    Image(Image: Robin Ironside at Pallant House, Chichester)

    Bethlem Heritage, South London UK (www.bethlemheritage.org.uk)

    8th – 30th March 2012
    ‘There is Good in Us’

    An exhibition of Geroge Harding’s work – “The work encourages people to look at ‘us’ in a way that is celebratory, unconventional and can teach us something about different ways of being.”

    Pallant House, Chichester UK (www.pallant.org.uk)

    28th Feb – 22nd April 2012
    ‘Robin Ironside: Neo-Romantic Visionary’

    Galerie Gugging, Austria (www.gugging.org)

    Until 22nd April 2012
    ‘Inschriftierungen’

    Galerie Miyawaki, Kyoto Japan (www.galerie-miyawaki.com)

    March 2012
    Exhibition on the work of Outsider Artist Hans Krusi

    Art et Marges Musee, Belgium (www.artetmarges.be)

    10th Feb – 20th May 2012
    ‘La Fabuloserie: le fabuleux destin des Bourbonnais’

    Museum Im Lagerhaus, Switzerland (www.museumimlagerhaus.ch)

    Until 11th March 2012
    ‘Hidden Treasures from Swiss Psychiatry II: Encounters’

    Frist Center for Visual Arts, Tennessee (www.fristcenter.org)

    24th Feb – 29th May 2012
    ‘Fairy Tales, Monsters and the Genetic Imagination’

  • Pre-World War I: Primitivism, Nostalgia and the Rise of German Expressionism

    German Expressionism was born out of the influence of a variety of earlier movements, styles and subject matter, and of course, through the discontent of many avant-garde artists with recent modernisation and the alienation of urban living. Paul Gauguin (1848 – 1903), a French Post-Impressionist, proved significantly influential on the works of German Expressionists. Gauguin developed the visual language of ‘syntheticism.’ German Expressionism also undoubtedly takes some inspiration from Gauguin’s use of primitive artefacts and colour symbolism, as well as his use of nature without “(falling into) the abominable error of naturalism.” Vincent van Gogh (1853 – 90), was an incredibly important figure in the development of Expressionism, with the vibrant energy and colours found in his work. German Expressionists such as Ernst Ludwig Kirchner (1880 – 1938), Emil Nolde (1857 – 1956) and Ludwig Meidner (1884 – 1966) greatly identified with van Gogh’s alienation and isolation from the world, and his reliance on the ‘inner world’ to create, rather than external stimulation.

    The Brucke group, named after a quote by Friedrich Nietzsche, in which he states that “what is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal,” was founded in 1905, after the meeting of Fritz Bleyl (1880 – 1966), Kirchner, Karl Schmidt-Rottluff (1884 – 1976) and Erich Heckel (1883 – 1970) at the Dresden Technical College during their time there as architecture students. However, Bleyl left the group in 1907 to pursue a career in architecture, so the core group always remembered is made up of Kirchner, Heckel, Schmidt-Rottluff and Max Pechstein (1881 – 1955). These Expressionist artists were not content with the technical innovations and modern advancements that the early twentieth-century carried with it. The idea of the primitive was very much a basis for a large amount of the Brücke artists’ work. German Expressionists used the notion of timeless primitivism, and the borrowing from other traditions and cultures as a way to ignore what was actually occurring in Germany at the time, as well as to show their adversity to the modern world.

    The idea of the artist’s rejection of society and the urban city crop up throughout the history of art in Germany, for example, prior to Die Brücke, was Wilhelm Riehl’s Land und Leute (1857 – 63), which advocated traditional countryside living as the ultimate symbol of German tradition, as well as Carl Vinnen’s Worpswede Stimmungsladschaften (mood landscapes) and Arnold Bocklin’s mythological landscapes, which showed a romantic and untainted vision of countryside living. The notion of returning to nature is also highlighted in Adolf von Menzel’s a Journey Through Beautiful Nature, of 1892, which depicts figures in elegant clothing aboard a crowded train, desperately yearning to catch a glimpse of the countryside through the windows, yet irreparably isolated from it. Kirchner’s own figures in the countryside represent the unity of the human race with the natural environment, for example, Four Bathers of 1910, which was created during one of the Brucke artists’ summer trips to the Moritzburg lakes. His urban figures, however, show the alienation felt by people during the years of modernisation, like his piece entitled Five Women on the Street of 1913, part of his Street Scene series, which has defining primitive aspects and characteristics which Kirchner has used in attempt to highlight the contradictions of modernity.

    Emil Nolde, one of the most well-known German Expressionists, who was also a member of Die Brücke between 1906 and 1907, often showed his disdain for technological advancement and modern society within his work. He seldom depicted huge technological developments, such as that of the automobile or the aeroplane, and the hustle and bustle of city life goes undetected in his work. Nolde successfully avoided any representation of the modern world, even during his journey to New Guinea in 1913, where he chose to depict Russian peasants, and ignore the train and tracks his wife and he were travelling across. Despite spending every winter in the city of Berlin, the only signs of city life within Nolde’s work were the interiors of cafes and cabarets.

    Cesare Lombroso, an Italian psychiatrist, understood ‘madness’ to be a descent back into a primitive, or child-like stage of growth, and similar to this descent, was the use of primitivism by German Expressionists to represent their nostalgia for an earlier time; a time before modernisation. Similarly, Adolf Wolfli (1864 – 1930), a Swiss Outsider Artist, created art after his psychotic collapse as a way to emerge from chaos into stability. In a similar way, the German Expressionists escaped from the isolation and alienation of modern urban living through nostalgic primitive painting. Pascal Maisonneuve (1863 – 1934), a French Outsider Artist, portrayed his defiance and discontent with society and politics through his ‘shell faces,’ which he created by collecting strange objects and shells and arranging them into faces. These ‘shell faces’ defied conventional representation and ridiculed political figures, much in the same way as Expressionism was used as a new form of representation that was ideal for portraying discontent and frustration.

    A “direct and unadulterated” creative urge was crucial to the Brucke programme. Nolde would often concentrate exclusively on a specific subject matter in intense bursts of activity and in his autobiography, the artist conjures up images of himself as being “preoccupied only with his art.” Similarly, Kirchner would work obsessively, without taking notice of the time, and would often emphasise his mental distress as a key driving force behind his work; just as Outsider Artist, Wolfli, never planned in advance. In fact, one of the defining characteristics of Outsider Art is the appearance of compulsion; the need to fill in the gaps and continually create. Of course, the term Expressionism itself insinuates the “urge to express oneself,” and this urge is what enabled the German Expressionists to work without inhibitions, painting directly from the nude in the studio for bursts of approximately fifteen minutes, putting their own subjective stamp on the subject matter.

    The years directly prior to the break out of the First World War saw an escalation and intensification within Kirchner’s work, which eventually led to his prominent Street Scenes; of which there are eleven works, all executed between the years of 1913 and 1915.  The members of Die Brücke had moved to Berlin in 1911, following Max Pechstein who had relocated in 1908, where they had worked together as a group for another couple of years before dividing and going their separate ways. The last recorded work by the Brücke artists jointly was the poster for the exhibition entitled ‘Neuer Kunstsalon’ dated the 27th May 1913. In the pre-war climate of Berlin, the artists became withdrawn. Kirchner began his Street Scenes, which included his Berlin Street Scene of 1913.

    Kirchner reportedly took to stimulants such as alcohol, sex and morphine during his time in Berlin, and right up until his suicide in 1938 he was continually fighting a battle with loneliness and alienation, and his frustration and discontent with modern city life. Kirchner was keen to emphasise the dangers of modernisation within society, which he managed not only in his Street Scenes, but also in his colour lithograph of The Railway Accident of 1914. Here, a freight train is shown colliding with a horse drawn carriage, with Kirchner illustrating the destruction that can be associated with modernisation. The imminent outbreak of the First World War saw a huge shake up in the way people saw modern life, the city and their country. Inevitably, the War had a huge impact on everything from culture to the economy and as a result of this; the Weimar era would see a whole new side of German Expressionism.